<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How about this for Entrecard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/</link>
	<description>Tyler Mulligan's Tips and Tricks For Increasing Efficiency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deimos Tel`Arin</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-11356</link>
		<dc:creator>Deimos Tel`Arin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-11356</guid>
		<description>Seems like Turnip suggested what you originally suggested:

http://turnipofpower.com/2008/05/01/proposal-to-filter-out-entrecard-splogs/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Turnip suggested what you originally suggested:</p>
<p><a href="http://turnipofpower.com/2008/05/01/proposal-to-filter-out-entrecard-splogs/" rel="nofollow">http://turnipofpower.com/2008/05/01/proposal-to-filter-out-entrecard-splogs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invest with Dax</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>Invest with Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5761</guid>
		<description>Those are some great ideas.  I love your work and you obviously understand web users.  There is alot of crap.  hopefully my site isn&#039;t one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are some great ideas.  I love your work and you obviously understand web users.  There is alot of crap.  hopefully my site isn&#8217;t one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entrepreneur</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5511</link>
		<dc:creator>Entrepreneur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5511</guid>
		<description>I think this is a great idea because there are a lot of crap sites out there.  This will actually keep people from just searching sites to drop their cards -or at least encourage them to not just drop and leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a great idea because there are a lot of crap sites out there.  This will actually keep people from just searching sites to drop their cards -or at least encourage them to not just drop and leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5459</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5459</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe it is enough.  I can think of a few sites that are in the top 3 for their category that don&#039;t deserve to be for reasons such as scrapping.

I believe a lot of people just have them in their rounds and are too lazy to replace the blogs with quality ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe it is enough.  I can think of a few sites that are in the top 3 for their category that don&#8217;t deserve to be for reasons such as scrapping.</p>
<p>I believe a lot of people just have them in their rounds and are too lazy to replace the blogs with quality ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5458</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5458</guid>
		<description>I can see EC doing this when they&#039;ve got a pretty good user base, say 10k+, when they have to start to find more ways to weed out unwanted blogs.  But right now, without the voting system, EC is attracting a lot of people because it&#039;s a nice way to send traffic to anyone&#039;s blog, without prejudice.

Besides, isn&#039;t the cost of placing an ad and the 125x125 icon considered good enough indication if the site&#039;s worth visiting, or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see EC doing this when they&#8217;ve got a pretty good user base, say 10k+, when they have to start to find more ways to weed out unwanted blogs.  But right now, without the voting system, EC is attracting a lot of people because it&#8217;s a nice way to send traffic to anyone&#8217;s blog, without prejudice.</p>
<p>Besides, isn&#8217;t the cost of placing an ad and the 125&#215;125 icon considered good enough indication if the site&#8217;s worth visiting, or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberstreetreport.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Popular Posts For Your Reading Enjoyment</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5367</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberstreetreport.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Popular Posts For Your Reading Enjoyment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5367</guid>
		<description>[...] Know Evil blog, submitted a post to CyberStreet that has two very unique ideas for EntreCard.  The idea I am most fond of is the drop and vote concept.  Essentially, every time you drop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Know Evil blog, submitted a post to CyberStreet that has two very unique ideas for EntreCard.  The idea I am most fond of is the drop and vote concept.  Essentially, every time you drop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5327</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5327</guid>
		<description>I like the idea a lot, but I would wonder about one change. How about taking on a stumble kind of feel and just offering 2 clicks, a thumbs up and a thumbs down, instead of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Perhaps the ups and downs could affect the cost of purchasing space on the block?

As always, this will only work (as with your 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 method) if people are honest. Would be unfair to have everyone voting down people in order to lessen the prices of advertising on their spots.

I am interested to see if something will come of this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea a lot, but I would wonder about one change. How about taking on a stumble kind of feel and just offering 2 clicks, a thumbs up and a thumbs down, instead of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Perhaps the ups and downs could affect the cost of purchasing space on the block?</p>
<p>As always, this will only work (as with your 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 method) if people are honest. Would be unfair to have everyone voting down people in order to lessen the prices of advertising on their spots.</p>
<p>I am interested to see if something will come of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5323</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5323</guid>
		<description>I think having a rating system is a good one.
It should be worth a shot, &amp; could be scraped if it fails</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think having a rating system is a good one.<br />
It should be worth a shot, &amp; could be scraped if it fails</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5280</guid>
		<description>Sean, I don&#039;t believe you understand the mockups.  You aren&#039;t rating the current advertisement in the widget but the site the widget is on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I don&#8217;t believe you understand the mockups.  You aren&#8217;t rating the current advertisement in the widget but the site the widget is on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/comment-page-1/#comment-5279</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doknowevil.net/2007/12/28/how-about-this-for-entrecard/#comment-5279</guid>
		<description>It a good idea, but why would they vote before they have even seen the site?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It a good idea, but why would they vote before they have even seen the site?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
